Unfortunately, two-track dispute the right of invention

 Unfortunately, two-track dispute over rights to inventions Moganshan meeting
sorghum Zhang Shaojie
Watson witness Source: 21st Century Business Herald
1984  9 month, by the Young workers in the National Symposium on Economic Science consider it necessary to come forward and clear historical facts.
two-track dispute the right of the origin of the invention
Originally, multi-track multi-track and even the price, was the originator of the progressive advance reform and opening up, the price adjustment with the natural product release . Moganshan meeting is proposed to capitalize on the trend, however, this practice of intentionally or unintentionally, into a conscious strategy to achieve the transition of China's economy.
records and reports at the time that, at the price reform Moganshan problem is divided into three factions: the source for the deployment of the field representatives; release sent to Weiying as representatives; Watson, Hejia Cheng, Jiang Yue, sorghum, Zhang Shaojie and others proposed a third combination of claim mm release two-track adjustment idea, have been meeting agreed to when he was State Councilor Zhang Jinfu Comrade reported, and ultimately adopted by the central authorities.
However, the release stressed combined two-track strategy for advancing the implementation from the start, to have been a considerable amount of responsibility doubt and criticism, which With the reform in depth and contradictions accumulate, even notorious in the late 1980s, several of us who propose two-track system will naturally become a focus of criticism targets. Therefore, all documents open in the 1980s and even the media information only controversy surrounding the two-track system, No one invented out of contention for the right.
1990's dual-track system to be more the beginning of an overall positive evaluation, Watson'd pointed out many times in the memoir, two-track system is the collective wisdom of Moganshan meeting, and he and related parties simply because of historical accident and opportunities, became symbolic representatives. The right of today's so-called dual-track system argue the invention, as the author of Xu Jingan Moganshan meeting pointed out the main report, is Weiying in the 1990s, started it.
Weiying in the 1990s published books on their own in the introduction, the first self-styled know where he is presented and discussed. Therefore, even though over 1980 people are very surprised to see them, but none of us did not come out to select suspect and rejected. Weiying until its publication in 2006 of home, ; on. In the article, made his first two-track price system reform ideas. Moganshan meeting he said I was put to send representatives. In the end, my point of view to persuade the majority of people, the conference organizers to government leaders r l easy way to listen to my point of view made some amendments to the State Council put forward the meeting The price of Reform, led by the State Council, the attention, l r the resulting two-track price reform of China's official policy. memories are very different, thus causing the so-called debate on the dual system of invention.
as a witness and the parties of this history, we always felt that after the changes of history is very regrettable, but the two-track system has been down in history compete for the right of individuals not the invention of what it meant, so these years we have been avoiding to make a positive statement on the Weiying comments.
However, the recent meeting in Moganshan essentially single-handedly turns fight, more and more applause, memories diametrically opposed, can not simultaneously be true. Weiying said if true, then we've said several two-track meeting on the Moganshan who is lying and fake history. Thus, while such non-black and white case, the truth will always make it clear that some embarrassment, but as the history of what the parties have no room to avoid. We also had three decades of reform and opening up the occasion to clarify the truth, which is both history and the general public respect the right to know, but also help the purification of academic research and people's understanding of the true life story of the reform.
meeting
fact witness in the eyes of history, meeting on the situation in Mogan, meeting over the delegates has brought the country's media .1980 few, but they can influence the young reformers of course, major national decision-making will not be ignored. Moganshan sponsoring organizations of the meeting of media, After the two-track system had been adopted by the central authorities published an interview with Watson, and 4 in 1985 to Periodicals. article describes in detail how the meeting proposed by Watson and others, and to report to the leadership of the two-track release with the case transferred , including such a statement: characteristics of the price path of reform, , Weiying is putting the camp, has nothing to do with the dual system (see the Dean Professor Li Xiaoxi article. Moganshan meeting he was an active figure price group discussions, and in 1987 published representative of society at that time very influential on the views of the year 1999, when he was Secretary of the State Council Research Office as a macro, in his comments when this paper in the 1980s, the generation of two-track system of the year made a complete Description: was promoted as the main ideas of economic reform, it is from the beginning of the meeting. Moganshan meeting in l r, there are three ways of price reform debate: a price to bring up the main idea, and this is the price of the State Council center represented by Comrade Tian; a price to put the main idea, which is represented by Comrade Weiying; there is a advocate dual pricing system, this is the Academy of Social Sciences Watson, represented by Comrade He Jiacheng. In retrospect, to bring up the main idea of conservative, hh prices to put the main, hh possible haste makes waste, anti leading the reform to fail. Most people agree that dual pricing system point of view. hh this line of thinking, and later approval by the Central leaders. Therefore, the price of dual pricing system as a major policy reform introduced. was removed in a main report, summed up in two ideas, however, were grouped and not others but it is precisely removed Weiying point of view. This is because the session leader of the majority of people and organizations that release of a free market price views are too radical, is not feasible, while leaders have stressed the view that, therefore, at the meeting to report to the State Councilor Zhang Jinfu comrades, decided to report only two-track system to send to the idea of Watson, while meeting the reform proposals submitted by the two prices were assigned Tian Yuan, Watson drafting, as an attachment by the sum of these two proposals Xu Jingan written combination of ideas. In this regard, an important meeting to participate in Mogan and organizers, but also in Moganshan Weiying work unit after the meeting that China's economic reform Chen, director of the Institute have a clear description of the consultation. < br> He recalls that when the State Council had to report in person meetings to introduce the mechanism, in principle, yes, but not the specific operational, make such observations of young scholars to understand economics, but not know enough about the actual situation of China; second opinion is too strong, that the current can only do price adjustment, tone only after parity reasonable price reform, the problem is never subjective transfer price adjustment Watson, Zhang Shaojie, sorghum, represented that the prices must be liberalized gradually open to form a market mechanism, let go of the price adjustment is an administrative directive, called the release tone combination, the first release after the transfer. This are ways to gradually expand the market share, so that mandatory plans to gradually reduce the proportion of raw materials and products, and finally to most of the price determined by the market. The problem is that some people may take advantage of the two spread out speculation, but there can be no perfect program, as long as the benefits and disadvantages of small to large can be .
such as Xu Jingan, said he recalled the factual point of view at the three schools of different arguments, see text Weiying to him after the old leadership of the Economic Restructuring of the work done, but no matter how Weiying He really could not recall at the Weiying and put transfer Mogan combined two-track system have anything to do, and can not do Weiying card. Weiying Youyi the grounds of intellectual property rights, and resolutely oppose Xu Jingan the two of them published on this dialogue, he is the last resort to write the article to clarify the statement Weiying and thoroughly after years of turning the case then Moganshan session, participants on all of us, it can not help but hear staggering. Moganshan price field representatives to discuss a major source, heard at a gathering of people, claiming Weiying proposed two-track system, and persuaded most of Moganshan meeting, Tian Yuan publicly ask sarcastically asked, home, , the implementation of two-tier prices, the old price of the old approaches to the management, new methods with new approaches to the management, the final establishment of a new alternative to the price system. The earliest proponent.
Now Weiying Mogan said he would be back in writing before a comprehensive dual-track discussion and mountains with the article, why he did not mention at the two-track system in Moganshan? or another person after out publicly declared his article, so that participants, including economic restructuring after joined by his many colleagues and convince leaders on the spot, to wait until 20 years later, it took a little seen and heard of no one The scanned documents effortlessly convince others to do around?
first meeting on Moganshan dual-track system and the monorail system is not the debate, but let it and the tone of the debate, and Weiying is to send a high-profile market place resolutely opposed to transfer.
had Weiying article also mentioned a long tune, say yes, After having deployed at the mountain, completely abandoned his vague or may be to emphasize the idea, put into a complete school, and deployed in a fierce debate. In this case, there's a third idea is Comprehensive two views put tone, the release, transfer all as a rail, put together tune called two-track combination.
were talking about the main two-track system in tune from the loud speaker, walking on two legs, two-track advance this dynamic sense said, and not to engage in program emphasizes both internal and external prices, as participants and leaders do not accept it. In fact, many participants impressed me most was when Watson and pointing gestures to convince the audience and led a strong argument, not advocating engage in two-tier price, but on the contrary, that the Decentralized Multiple Price has appeared inevitable, then, make the best first release scheme prices, the state organization of production in the market, can stimulate the supply, so that the price whereabouts, and then up the price adjustment plan, the plan approach and combined internal and external prices. It is this grasp this opportunity and make the track more normalized price reverse forward ideas and eventually moved the relevant decision makers.
just put two-track price adjustment after the implementation of integrated strategies in the formation of a transitional form, afterwards became a popular buzzword. Moganshan meeting was in the main report and the leadership of instructions are put in tune with that, and no mention of dual-track system. current state Comrade Zhang Jinfu members to listen to listen to Watson reporting for the first time the word referred specifically asked: prices and market speculation and more questions, Watson explained with the dual tone put forward in order to solve this problem, that of are close to, multivalent normalization . Because of his high-profile adhere to the market price of the be confused with the two-track adjustment.
Second, the article said Zhang Weiying large spread of production prices can be adjusted step by step, after release or discharge, at a time when big is the spread of production, the price had also called two-track year dual system of production prices. this area is precisely the first place and can not be adjusted in order to reconcile the first place while that tune after tune with the first release is the price of Moganshan meeting summed up the difference between reform and the two ideas. < br> So, if the article as evidence only Weiying, he is swinging between the two ideas. Weiying said now is the two-track release, that he still did not understand the true meaning of two-track system, nor understand why he had the made high-profile target model and the market price put on the school advocated Moganshan no reason by the majority.
Weiying put ideas were not adopted at the meeting, he will own after the price reform on the main ideas are summarized in an article entitled Economic System Reform Institute published a paper focused on (This article does not mention place throughout Weiying tune with, or even completely avoid that this time the dual system has become very hot word, he removed to show the internal two-track system mentioned in the article only three words of one, to track prices, shows that he intends to differentiate themselves from the meeting place with the tone with two-track system Moganshan boundaries. after the meeting although he and many of Mogan in the Restructuring of the same participants, but no longer discuss this topic with others, the vision of people fading out late .1980 controversy surrounding the two-track strategy to the extent of white-hot, Weiying never participated debate, but completely indifferent, and even wrote his own two-track system in the organization did not participate in the research discussion paper , said no sentence for the two-track system in the affirmative.
Therefore, the so-called two-track system with Weiying article caused a sensation in the mountains, the view Weiying a meeting to convince the majority, two-track system in the 1980s he was scolded for all the curse words, we can not not lie. because at that time that he claims he has no Weiying two-track system, at which most people do not agree with his views but denied all the curse words will appear in today's online world, there is no possibility Only a few official media in the 1980s.
fact is very clear.
Weiying pulled out of that discussion involved. to the 1990s, when Russia's shock therapy was generally responsible for the reform doubt, a new awareness of the Chinese experience, the Nobel laureate in economics Joseph Stiglitz and even praised the two-track system is the Chinese people in transition After the genius of creation, Weiying suddenly on the right track system have great interest in the invention, proposed and demonstrated two-track price system reform ideas of the scholars. Unfortunately, he is in a book entitled also pointed out that he mentioned is very simple, not known, the promotion of social awareness is not working. Weiying internal document which is not mentioned in the year Moganshan raised, and was adopted put the central transfer combined two-track idea, but the concept of a similar two-tier price, go to guide public opinion, China's combined two-track release is his tone made to the.
, however, to a new century, with the rise Weiying status and fame, he first to propose two-track began to have some impact statement, but he was no longer satisfied or can not stop on their own is just made, he took part in the Moganshan meeting to bring the text, it must be logical he presented a two-track system in Moganshan and persuaded most of the meeting, the results to be led to adopt his views, and promote China's the progress of economic reform. But to do so on the final touches Weiying all prices Moganshan meeting participants discussed the moral bottom line. informants provided in a timely manner to meet all stunned.
like Xu Jingan said, come this far, Weiying to improve their academic standing, to seek maximum benefits, a bit irrational. because to prove the point, it must be declared: Since the 1980s, produced the original two-track meeting on the process of Mogan relevant reports, records and memories are made up and lies; Moganshan conference participants and organization leaders to put Weiying gratuitous transfer to others in public view; Weiying himself personally saw the results of their possession by others in the meeting were silent throughout the 1980s and even accepted; so and so other.
but the witness Moganshan meeting are still alive, the core organizers of the meeting or have entered the ranks of national leaders, Weiying claim to be meeting in Moganshan the majority of people applauded as the only proper representative of nod, it is indeed beyond the imagination of all of us. But in history to take the risk that people can not understand, like academic fraud, witness the meeting in order Moganshan into a huge embarrassment, but also to their own shame.
should be noted that in addition Weiying Moganshan meeting must be wiped off the third camp, he has now deployed the criticism is very unfair. Weiying In an interview, said he and Tian, who the target is the price differences between different modes, others are planned price, so with the tune, he argued that the market price model, which with put, his argument with the others into the reform and conservative differences. In fact, the year of the young reformers in the objectives of the reform model and there is no fundamental differences, the argument lies in the way the transition. Xiaoping's goal was to rationalize the prices are raised to find means to reconcile and put way. Tian is instead a transfer, but does not exclude a release after the conditions are ripe. Jiange introduced at the meeting, Zhou Xiaochuan, Lou Jiwei, a small fast transfer ideas, but also set and guided the transition to supply and demand balance, so the differences we The focus is on how the transition.
fact, the practice of price reform in China has proved the ultimate, pure tone, or put a track price reform can not fulfill the complex and gradual transition, it is placed, with the dual tone and by walking on two legs, before going out price reform of China's success. dual-track concept of the impact was so great, because it was found that China's dual system of gradual reform and transformation of co-existence during the incremental development, adjustment and transformation is a common stock of the road to success is to correctly handle the development, reform and stability between the concrete embodiment. dual system is summarized well the concept of incremental progressive reform. And these early exit after the meeting with discussion Moganshan Weiying nothing to do, and then continue to advocate and Weiying various radical views are contradictory. Weiying now says, did not put there is no dual system, which is equivalent to two-track release. So do not tune to a two-track system? countries with the adoption of adjustment is placed, how can lack of a practice hard, do not really understand what is the dual system, that rely on China's price reform is a in the late 1980s had suffered a serious challenge and the community's strong rebound is adjusted by the combination of place to put efforts to promote two-way transfer only through the rapids to the final price reform, the basic completion.
should be noted that the economic system Reform of Chinese economists as a group did play a role, but no one should be easy to revise history, exaggerating the role of individuals. also fair to say that Chinese economists what their original limited, more of a learning and learn from other people's things. in the drawing, if combined with their own characteristics, some development, we innovated. point of view, from the rectification of names for the money, the market price and the open, entrepreneurial function, the privatization of the logic of capital employed labor, etc., in the West is the first in China, not to say it. Weiying, perspective tune with the recommendations put Moganshan thus affecting the reform it? what else can we pick the fruit it?
In fact, economists should know that the real history of promoting social transformation and progress of a government action and public interactive practice. In commemoration of the thirtieth anniversary of reform and opening up, the main task of economists is to really Summing up the lessons learned over the past three decades, the next three years for the Chinese people greater and more arduous journey, provide some predictability of how many and perspective of professional power. economists even to leave some traces of the individual, this is the display area can truly unlimited.
Xu Jingan Weiying in the article last words should represent the Moganshan Conference witness to say,